EssentialFRCS

Transplantation and immunology

Principles of Surgery in General · 16 questions · 1 free to try

Brainstem death and donation after circulatory death, ischaemia times, HLA matching and crossmatching, immunosuppressant mechanisms and toxicities, the types and timing of rejection, opportunistic infection and malignancy after transplantation, and the law on consent for donation.

Every question in this topic is a single best answer item in the style of the exam, followed by an explanation that gives the reasoning for the correct option, why each distractor is wrong, a key point to carry into the exam and, where one applies, the guideline or trial it rests on. Practice mode lets you work through the topic on its own or mixed with others; exam mode draws it into timed papers.

Sample question from this topic

Minutes after reperfusion of a kidney transplant, the graft turns from pink to a mottled, dusky blue, becomes flaccid, and stops producing urine on the table. The anaesthetist confirms good systemic pressure. It emerges that a pre-transplant crossmatch result was misreported. What has happened, and what is the underlying mechanism?

  1. AAcute tubular necrosis from prolonged cold storage; the graft will recover with supportive care
  2. BHyperacute rejection: preformed antibodies bind graft endothelium on reperfusion, causing thrombosis and infarction; the graft must be removed
  3. CAcute cellular rejection, treatable with pulsed steroids
  4. DChronic allograft nephropathy
  5. ERenal artery kinking, corrected by repositioning
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B

A graft that perfuses pink and then dies on the table — mottling, cyanosis, flaccidity, anuria — with systemic haemodynamics intact is hyperacute rejection: the recipient already possesses circulating antibodies against donor antigens (anti-ABO isohaemagglutinins, or anti-HLA antibodies from prior transplants, transfusions or pregnancies), and the instant blood flows, antibody coats the donor endothelium, fixing complement, recruiting platelets and neutrophils, and thrombosing the entire microvasculature — type II hypersensitivity executed at organ scale. There is no treatment; the infarcted graft is removed. Its importance is almost entirely preventive, and that is the examinable core: ABO compatibility, HLA typing, screening the recipient for anti-HLA antibodies, and the pre-transplant crossmatch — testing recipient serum against donor lymphocytes (now usually virtual, from comprehensive antibody profiling) — exist precisely to make hyperacute rejection a historical rarity; a positive crossmatch vetoes the transplant. The vignette's misreported crossmatch is the classic systems failure behind modern cases.

Why the others are wrong: A — ATN causes delayed function in a viable-looking graft, not intraoperative infarction. C — acute cellular rejection is a T-cell process of days to weeks, treatable with steroids. D — chronic changes evolve over years. E — vascular kinking causes congestion or pallor correctable with repositioning, not diffuse thrombotic mottling with preserved inflow anatomy.

Key point: Hyperacute rejection — preformed anti-donor antibody meeting graft endothelium at reperfusion, complement-driven microvascular thrombosis, graft death within minutes — is untreatable and prevented entirely by ABO matching, antibody screening and the crossmatch; that is why those tests are inviolable.

Guidelines: BSHI/BTS guidance on HLA antibody testing and crossmatching in transplantation: hyperacute rejection from preformed donor-specific antibody is prevented by ABO typing, antibody screening and pre-transplant crossmatching; the graft is removed once it occurs.

Practise transplantation and immunology questions

A free account includes questions from every part of the syllabus, including 1 from this topic. Subscribe for all 16 in this topic and the rest of the bank.

Create your free account

Other topics in Principles of Surgery in General